Analysis of The Hitchhiker by Roald Dahl

Anyone who loves reading books or has taken an English course at the university must have come across “the hitchhiker”. If you have no freaking idea what this is about, I feel bad for you. My best guess is that you landed on this page through a Google search “Four Levels of The Hitchhiker by Roald Dahl” or any similar combination of keywords. If that’s the case, you have come to the right place on the web. The following analysis of the Hitchhiker was the part of the assignment I submitted to my English professor back in my college days and I got a good rating for it. And so should you!

Let’s take a look at this masterpiece by Roald Dahl. Drop your comments below and share this note with your classmates as well. Don’t be selfish! Thank me later!

The Hitchhiker
The Hitchhiker

Four Levels of The Hitch-hiker by Roald Dahl

Literal Comprehension

The “Hitchhiker” is a first-person Narrative story. The narrator was on his way to the jeweler in London, all alone in his new pale blue colored MW car of 3.3 l with and a top speed of 129 mph. He happened to see a man thumbing for a lift. As the narrator was attuned to the experience of being a hitchhiker, he invited the man to come into his car. The hitchhiker, Michael Fish, was going to Epsom. They talked and the narrator told the hitch-hiker about himself. He explained that he was a writer. The hitchhiker commented on the narrator’s profession as a skilled one, stating that he himself was also in a skilled profession.

The hitchhiker challenged the narrator to see if the car really could get up to its top speed of 129 mph. They drove to a stretch of flat even road, and the narrator opened up the throttle. He reached up to 120 mph just as the police officer flashed his sirens and pulled him over. The officer issued the narrator threats of license cancellation, and imprisonment, and gave him an offense ticket.

The cop also noted the hitchhiker’s address and occupation. After the cop departed, the narrator was worried. But the hitchhiker consoled him that nothing would happen. The hitchhiker then revealed that he is a finger-smith, a very skilled pickpocket by showing all of the narrator’s possessions with him. He then told the narrator that he had taken the cop’s ticket and notebooks, adding that they should leave the highway and make a bonfire to burn ‘em on.

Interpretation

The story may be trying to tell us that an uneducated man with the finest skills can be superior to the learned ones in some the cases. They can prove to be better in the field of their expertise. The story can also be interpreted that education is the means and ends to everything in this world; one can also be extraordinary with special skills without education.

A man with correct grammar and writing skills may not be able to tackle some tricky situations, but the same situation can be easily tackled by a person with extraordinary skills and no education. Besides, the story might also be trying to say that policemen are the most ill-mannered people in the world. Their level of thinking is too poor and they lack sense of humor. Furthermore, the story might be trying to mean that we should never undervalue anyone who looks ordinary as they can be hidden treasures.

Critical Thinking

“The Hitchhiker” is a masterpiece by Roald Dahl. This is one of the most readable gripping stories, with every second arousing reader’s interest. The presentation of the story is marvelous. The domination of dialogue over narration has made it more dramatic and more life-like. Its teaching will always be guiding its readers freshly with its greatest philosophy that the secret of life is to be very good at something that is impossibly hard to accomplish. It is too much agreeable that no easy work makes a man great. Hardships bring success in our life.

But despite all, for a critical thinker, this story is a gold mine. Michael Fish performs some Herculean job of taking off one’s belt, shoelace, and other belongings like watch… etc. from the narrator’s body, and the ticket books and the notebook from the policeman’s pocket. He also concedes that was the easiest job he had ever done. He also proclaims that he could even take out the narrator’s false teeth out of his mouth without his knowledge if he had any.

This all sound a little too much. The character of Michael Fish can please a reader when he outsmarts a policeman. But it is too tall to create a character with power of a phantom. So the prominent flaw of this story is to create a ghostly character that deprives the story of giving it a realistic touch. The character isn’t humanly and the readers cannot empathize with him. He is beyond anyone, maybe a much desired persona.

Assimiliation

Reading of this story has changed much of me. I felt that one needs a lot of formal education to be efficient, capable, genius, respectable, and likable. But my views are shaken badly after reading this story. I have realized that individualism is not a matter of education alone. One can make a career by being an expert in any field that is extremely hard to do. I have got an insight that I will never be able to achieve fame and success by doing ordinary, petty jobs. Therefore, I need to coach myself to do something that is pretty tough and sounds almost impossible.

I have also understood by reading this story that we should never be deterred from trying the impossible and achieving the impossible. I have also realized that “a book shouldn’t be judged by its cover.” We can judge a person only by having proper knowledge of one’s intrinsic capabilities and skills. Seems like I have to search for a new role model… A Pirate. All these years I have been wasting my time learning all those sh!t I will have to unlearn later.

That’s it! You are welcome!

Before you go… Since you will graduate through this BBA before you know what hit you… you should read this one: Wake up. Kick Ass. Repeat.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *